Re: That's not totally correct Marty

Posted by Jerry in Idaho [162.158.106.117] on Wednesday, October 09, 2019 at 10:59:18 :

In Reply to: Re: That's not totally correct Marty posted by PwrWgnDrvr [172.68.141.73] on Tuesday, October 08, 2019 at 00:54:44 :

My '68 W300 came to me with dual wheels and a big utility box. When I mounted a factory 9' box on it I had to make some spacers for the rear axle to make it 2 1/2" wider on each side to make the single rear wheels line up with the front. So how could it be that the DRW axle is wider than the front? I'm confused.

Follow Ups:

• Re: Jerry, Bucky and Others - PwrWgnDrvr 23:23:49 10/09/2019
  • Re: Jerry, Bucky and Others - PwrWgnDrvr 23:54:05 10/09/2019
    • Re: Jerry, Bucky and Others - PwrWgnDrvr 22:49:25 10/10/2019
    • Re: Jerry, Bucky and Others - Kaegi 13:19:04 10/10/2019
      • Re: Jerry, Bucky and Others - PwrWgnDrvr 22:37:10 10/10/2019
• Dually's had narrower rears, & maybe wider fronts than SRW t - bucky 19:34:02 10/09/2019
• Re: That's not totally correct Marty - Clint Dixon 13:15:40 10/09/2019
  • Re: That's not totally correct Marty - Jerry Henry 11:58:09 10/11/2019
    • Re: That's not totally correct Marty - PwrWgnDrvr 00:04:11 10/12/2019
      • Re: That's not totally correct Marty - Jerry Henry 00:38:17 10/12/2019
        • Re: That's not totally correct Marty - PwrWgnDrvr 13:44:11 10/12/2019
          • Re: That's not totally correct Marty - Jerry Henry 14:45:17 10/12/2019
  • Re: That's not totally correct Marty - Paul ( in NY) 14:59:53 10/09/2019
    • Re: That's not totally correct Marty - MikeinMd 19:57:41 10/09/2019

Post a Followup