Posted by Eric B. on Sunday, September 15, 2002 at 12:39PM :
In Reply to: Great info on LU-2's posted by Russ in Seattle on Sunday, September 15, 2002 at 12:32PM :
It is begining to look like 57 date coded LU2s are LU2-L-5, instead of the 58 and up LU2-5 L
I hope more people chime in whith their numbers, maybe I can make sense of why you have a second L!
Thanks again for your help!
Eric