Posted by Vaughn [172.68.143.33] on Thursday, December 24, 2020 at 09:34:01 :
In Reply to: Long explanation posted by Clint Dixon [172.68.37.51] on Thursday, December 24, 2020 at 09:05:23 :
Yeah, it looks like the 410451 is no longer a good number. Is there one you would suggest replacing it with and should the page be updated? Thanks Clint for the explanation!
Follow Ups: