Re: why not a newer smaller unit?

Posted by Milo in Pa [162.158.78.174] on Tuesday, October 04, 2016 at 23:18:49 :

In Reply to: Re: why not a newer smaller unit? posted by Jim in Litchfield Park [162.158.141.30] on Tuesday, October 04, 2016 at 23:09:00 :

I think this one fits

• starter

Follow Ups:

• Re: why not a newer smaller unit? - Jim in Litchfield Park 00:48:20 10/05/2016
• Re: why not a newer smaller unit? - Jim in Litchfield Park 00:46:11 10/05/2016
  • two simple tests - JohnD 06:58:42 10/06/2016
    • Re: two simple tests - Tom Petroff (IL) 07:56:16 10/06/2016

Post a Followup