Posted by Bruce in BC [24.207.99.230] on Tuesday, August 11, 2015 at 12:43:05 :
In Reply to: Re: Not a 42 posted by Keith in Washington [24.41.55.51] on Monday, August 10, 2015 at 23:50:11 :
Could be an early, early 1942 or even a 1941 sold in 42 but it sure is not a WC53
Follow Ups: