Return to Website

SWEPTLINE CD's $20 Check or Money order to:James Megee1483 Perkins LaneEdgewater Park NJ 08010 or Paypal to: jmegee57@hotmail.comSee the CD page at http://www.olddodges.com/sweptlinecd.htm

61-71 Glove boxes, Core Support/Radiator seals, 69-71 Tool Stowage Decals, 69-71 Firewall Insluation Pads, and A100 glove boxes.Contact Gary Offill for pricing and info at gwo1988@yahoo.com
  
The '61-'71 Dodge Sweptline Truck Forum #36

The Official Forum of the DTA. Here's your place to talk about Dodge trucks made from 1961-1971. The Truck of The Week was submitted by Aaron. To view the DTA Photo Albums, click on the "Return to Website" link below. To view DodgeSweptline.Org, click on "DTA HOME"  Best viewed in 1024x768 Not affiliated with Chrysler LLC. Dodge is a registered trademark of Chrysler LLC

      


Return to Website

  Reply
  Home

Subject:   Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Swepty load center/terminal block info....
Name:   JimmieD
Date Posted:   Dec 2, 08 - 6:51 PM
IP Address:   66.81.197.176
Dodge-Link   http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=175197
Message:   That regarding electron flow in electrical theory was sarcasm, but If you check the links I posted they lead to a good explanation of that topic.

Latest 'new' theory says the electrons actually flow 'backwards', from negative to positive. Of course it involves protons, neutrons, electrons etc. but it is chin-slobbering ignorant for the fact that all the textbooks have to be re-written to teach this new translation of theory.

Nothing changed in the physics of it, just in the way it is explained. It's about like changing America's official language [hah, like we have one anymore] from English to Italian. When people talked they'd still be saying the same thing, meaning the same thing, but in a different language. Of course all books, signs, official documents etc. would have to be re-written, just so people could say the same thing differently!

That's what happened with electrical theory and yes, excellent old texts are now obsolete. One of those links, I think from the Physics forum, explains the change clearly and simply for what it is.
Replies:    
Re: Charge or Holes? by PwrWgnDrvr · Dec 2, 08 - 7:26 PM
Re: Re: Charge or Holes? by JimmieD · Dec 2, 08 - 9:04 PM
Re: Re: Re: Charge or Holes? by PwrWgnDrvr · Dec 2, 08 - 10:31 PM
Re: Re: Re: Re: Charge or Holes? by JimmieD · Dec 3, 08 - 9:29 AM
Now we see by PwrWgnDrvr · Dec 3, 08 - 7:19 PM
Re: If the point was as u say by PwrWgnDrvr · Dec 2, 08 - 6:57 PM
Re: U misunderstand your linked article by PwrWgnDrvr · Dec 2, 08 - 7:08 PM
Re: Bigger spark on Pos or Neg? by PwrWgnDrvr · Dec 2, 08 - 7:14 PM
Re: Re: Bigger spark on Pos or Neg? by JimmieD · Dec 2, 08 - 9:02 PM
Good point by Russ Ashley · Dec 3, 08 - 4:43 AM
Re: Good point by MoparNorm · Dec 4, 08 - 4:13 AM
Re: Re: Good point by MoparNorm · Dec 4, 08 - 4:14 AM
Re: Re: Re: Good point by PwrWgnDrvr · Dec 4, 08 - 6:26 AM
Re: Re: Re: Swepty load center/terminal block info.... by Russ Roth · Dec 2, 08 - 12:36 PM
This Has All Been One Big Load Of B.S. Information...... by Hobcobble · Dec 6, 08 - 5:19 AM


  Reply
  Home


powered by Powered by Bravenet bravenet.com