Posted by 002 (IL) [68.184.212.158] on Thursday, September 26, 2013 at 08:39:35 :
In Reply to: So what made them good for derbies? posted by Chewie [166.181.80.10] on Thursday, September 26, 2013 at 07:48:56 :
1960's Imperials were banned from derbies because the front of the cars are indestructible. If memory serves 64-68 were the best. However despite leaf springs bracing the rear the back of the cars were not as strong as others and was actually the weak link. 3 things seem to push them to the top. The front sub frame was apparently built much heavier/thicker and stronger then similar Chryslers, or any other production car. Imperial sub-frames can be bolted under several other model Chryslers of that era and was a favorite 2nd choice when that ban took hold. Additionally there are almost no holes in the boxed frame, keeping it free of intended or unintended crumple zones. Second the radiator support below the radiator was used as a mount for the front suspension thus being a crossmember, and a very strong one at that. Prior to the ban or at derbies that would allow them, most drivers would run without a front bumper using only the front cross member to do their damage. Third because the car is a uni-body it also carries strength through the upper fenders to the cabin. Inside the flat square fenders was a secondary "frame". The two together make a box around the engine compartment that was not matched by any other car. A suicide door Lincoln from the same era is similar but not as good. Many videos can be found. But non really do them justice.