Re: Carburetor Numbers

Posted by Clint dixon on Wednesday, November 10, 2004 at 1:08PM :

In Reply to: Carburetor Numbers posted by Jim Chance on Wednesday, November 10, 2004 at 8:58AM :

Jim, it looks like the only numbers in your list that don't agree with those shown in the chart on my (Phil's) page, are those for the early ET1, ET2, and ET4 carbureters, and the next carbureter (E7F1), that superseeded those. (Or the engine number at which time this change took place.

I used 20 pieces of original literature as reference to abtain the information, including the April 1956 parts manual. Where information didn't agree between the sources, I went with the numbers that the majority of the sources did agree upon.

If you send an email to me so I don't forget, I can look the information over again to see if I made a mistake.

• CARbureTER list

Follow Ups:

• I may have it figured out - Clint dixon 1:26PM 11/10/2004
  • Re: I may have it figured out - Clint dixon 2:15PM 11/10/2004
    • Re: I may have it figured out - tim kingsbury 10:02PM 11/10/2004
    • Re: I may have it figured out - Jim Chance 8:29PM 11/10/2004
      • Re: I may have it figured out - Clint Dixon 9:13PM 11/10/2004

Post a Followup