The engine was most likely not original...

Posted by Eric B. on Wednesday, August 25, 2004 at 7:56PM :

In Reply to: Re: WOW! $15,376 and an Engine that didn't look the part posted by John on Wednesday, August 25, 2004 at 7:52PM :

The engine number started with a IND for industrial, not T25 or S25 like it should have for a 1963 WM300.

Eric

• Power Wagon Registry!

Follow Ups:

• Re: The engine was most likely not original... - John 9:15PM 08/25/2004
  • Re: The engine was most likely not original... - Marty 9:39PM 08/25/2004
    • Re: The engine was most likely not original... - John 10:17PM 08/25/2004
      • Dont even worry about that.... - Jonas 0:29AM 08/26/2004
        • One other thing.... - Jonas 0:39AM 08/26/2004
      • Re: The engine was most likely not original... - Marty 10:46PM 08/25/2004
        • Re: The engine was most likely not original... - arthur p bloom 11:53PM 08/25/2004
          • Re: The engine was most likely not original... - John 7:57AM 08/26/2004

Post a Followup